Canada’s risky gamble on carbon capture and storage
The Breakdown
The promise of carbon capture and storage (CCS) to underpin Canada’s path to net-zero emissions is running headlong into economic, technical, and political reality. The Edmonton blue hydrogen project, once a flagship example of CCS deployment in heavy industry, now faces doubled project costs, delayed timelines, and uncertain profitability. Government support and regulatory initiatives continue, but evidence mounts that, without ongoing subsidies and strong policy alignment, large-scale CCS in the oil sands and other hard-to-abate sectors remains a high-risk, low-certainty proposition.
Analyst View
While the innovation imperative in decarbonizing Canada’s resource and industrial base remains strong, demand for low-carbon hydrogen and CCS-enabled products has not yet justified the scale of capital now being deployed. Delays and underperformance at the Edmonton facility underscore a fundamental disconnect: policy ambition and funding outpace actual market pull and readiness across the value chain.
Competitive pressure is strained as government subsidies are required to make projects even marginally investable. The operating environment is particularly volatile given fluctuating carbon prices, regulatory differences between jurisdictions, and skepticism around the credibility of emissions reductions attributed to CCS. Cost overruns and delayed construction not only erode investor confidence, but also raise difficult questions about the scalability and repeatability of CCS as a decarbonization lever in heavy industry.
Downstream channel partners and corporate buyers remain wary, with effective demand for hydrogen as a cleaner feedstock not materializing at expected rates. Furthermore, public and NGO scrutiny has intensified over whether CCS is a genuine bridge to lower emissions or an expensive mechanism to prolong hydrocarbon extraction. The value chain remains fragmented, and much of the return for CCS is still contingent on regulatory “carrots and sticks” rather than inherent market demand.
Policy incentives such as carbon pricing and contracts for difference are crucial but suffer from political risk, with changing federal and provincial attitudes threatening stability. This lack of predictability discourages bold capital deployment and stalls momentum around pilot-to-commerical scale transitions. Executives must recognize that, absent a credible and stable policy signal, CCS may fall short as a foundation of long-term decarbonization strategy.
Navigating the Signals
For leaders in specialty chemicals and polymers—and, by extension, all capital-intensive process industries—the picture is clear: dependence on policy-driven demand and public subsidy is an unstable ground on which to invest and plan. The scaling of CCS will be shaped less by technical capacity and more by sustained regulatory coherence, coordinated infrastructure buildout, and accumulation of credible market demand for low-carbon alternatives.
Executives should be asking: How robust are our business models to swings in carbon pricing and incentive programs? What level of exposure do we have if political sentiment shifts against climate intervention or decarbonization subsidies? Where do we have genuine pull from customers for low-carbon solutions, and what gaps remain in channel capacity, downstream adoption, and value chain integration?
Most importantly, companies should critically assess whether CCS is being used to delay harder—but ultimately necessary—structural changes to portfolios and asset bases. The risk is that over-reliance on an expensive, subsidy-dependent decarbonization technology will limit agility and erode shareholder value as customer and regulatory expectations continue to evolve.
What’s Next?
Breakthrough Marketing Technology helps B2B leaders navigate the strategic ambiguity and risk inherent in volatile policy environments and evolving value chains. Our approach delivers clarity and direction at inflection points, guiding organizations to:
- Map exposure to external policy, pricing, and regulatory shifts—and develop adaptive strategies accordingly.
- Quantify emerging market and customer requirements for low-carbon solutions to anchor investment decisions in real, rather than projected, demand.
- Assess partner and channel readiness, ensuring capability exists to support complex value propositions through to end users.
- Model alternative go-to-market scenarios so that investments in decarbonization and innovation are resilient across plausible regulatory and economic futures.
By connecting risk analysis to actionable market strategy, we empower decision makers to lead confidently—regardless of which way the policy winds blow.
Source
Understand Your Risk. Seize Your Opportunity.
Take the Breakthrough Market Uncertainty Assessment Guide to pinpoint what’s holding your growth back, and what can accelerate it.
