EU Faces Risky Divide Over Carbon Credits in 2040 Push

The Breakdown

The European Union’s scientific advisory board on climate change has issued strong guidance urging the bloc not to count international carbon credits toward its ambitious 2040 emissions reduction targets. The board argues this practice would undermine the credibility and effectiveness of Europe’s decarbonization agenda. As sectoral and national interests diverge—particularly between nations advocating some use of credits and those pressing for strict domestic action—the outcomes of this debate will materially shape the European policy environment and market signals for industrial emitters and the value chains dependent on them. For specialty chemical and polymer producers, the evolving regulatory landscape and its knock-on effects for investment, competitiveness, and operational priorities across Europe and globally are quickly coming into focus.

Analyst View

The recommendation to exclude international carbon credits from EU climate accounting signals a decisive pivot toward robust, verifiable domestic emissions reductions. As the bloc targets a 90-95% reduction by 2040, companies serving industrial and specialty chemical markets must anticipate a regulatory environment where only genuine, local decarbonization is recognized. This significantly raises the bar for compliance—and necessitates a review of not just operational emissions strategies, but also capital allocation and long-term innovation pipelines.

The political divide—highlighted by Germany’s and France’s negotiating positions and Poland’s election rhetoric—reveals that market signals remain dynamic and contested. Increasing scrutiny of carbon credit credibility further skews the risk-reward calculation in favor of proven emission-reducing technologies such as direct air capture and carbon storage. For B2B leaders, the competitive playing field may shift away from “offsetting” toward demonstrable, in-market abatement, with downstream customers likely to scrutinize environmental claims and certifications more than ever.

At the same time, the push for clearer, more differentiated targets from the European Commission introduces uncertainty into medium-term planning. The lack of a unified pathway and the growing complexity of incentives, compensation mechanisms, and support for industry compound the challenge. Companies must ready themselves for differentiated obligations by sector and geography, and for an acceleration in due diligence by both regulators and customers.

Navigating the Signals

The most immediate takeaway for chemical and polymer industry leaders is the imperative of preparing for regulatory tightening—both in substance and in enforcement. Domestic abatement capacity, transparent reporting, and the traceability of climate claims will become non-negotiable differentiators for market access and partnership.

Internal questions for leadership include: Is your portfolio aligned with what regulators and buyers will consider valid emission reductions? How resilient is your current compliance approach in the event that allowances for international credits disappear? Are investments in carbon management being targeted at the most credible solutions, and are you prepared for intensified scrutiny of environmental performance—both upstream and downstream?

Moreover, as political and public pressures mount, businesses should anticipate additional shifts in customer requirements and channel expectations, potentially impacting contract structures, pricing, and disclosure norms. Proactivity now—rather than chasing compliance later—will define the winners in the next leg of climate-driven market evolution.

Source

Read full article on www.ft.com